Моделирование антенны в CST Microwave

[Vodkaman]

????????????????

Jomy, I needed just one simple answer: Yes, or No.
Ideally, I expected you to say: "I prefer 20 per wave length instead of 15", or something like this...

[Vodkaman]

Когда уж Вас модеры отправят на курсы для гастрабайтеров?

И без ошибок!? :shok :

На самом деле ничего интересного...

[алексей м-в]

Когда уж Вас модеры отправят на курсы для гастрабайтеров?

То Aleks07111971 заставляет высшую математику учить,то Vodkaman английский язык.Так и придётся стать интеллигентным человеком.Крепись MOISNEG.

[MOISNEG]

Когда уж Вас модеры отправят на курсы для гастрабайтеров?

[jomy]

So, what do you think? Is it enough for correct simulation results?

????????????????

[Vodkaman]

,,, no, I'm talking about HFSS...!!!
,,,for optimization in CST, I'll show you later how is it done ...!!!

Jomy, I do understand what you mean! First part of my answer was about HFSS. The question of mine, was about mesh settings, not about optimization...
So, what do you think? Is it enough for correct simulation results?

[jomy]

,,, no, I'm talking about HFSS...!!!

[Vodkaman]

if you know,,, then shows how it's done...!!!

Let's say, I've heard about it...:derisive:
What do you think about these settings? Как тебе эти настройки?

[jomy]

HFSS can also. But for me, the biggest advantages of CST are КРАСИВЫЕ КАРТИНКИ!!! :yahoo:

if you know,,, then shows how it's done...!!!

[Vodkaman]

HFSS can also. But for me, the biggest advantages of CST are КРАСИВЫЕ КАРТИНКИ!!! :yahoo:

[jomy]

,, yeah, right,, but CST has another big advantage ... can optimize antenna structures !!!

[Vodkaman]

Both are very accurate and can be just as good in different situations, but sometimes you have to know what you're doing in setting up the simulations. CST can also handle electrically larger structures than HFSS on the same computer, but it'll take a long time to simulate (CST puts a lot of demand on processor, HFSS puts a lot on RAM). A 12G RAM PC was able to simulate one large model in CST (but took days) but unable at all in HFSS.

[jomy]

HFSS and CST are 3 D EM simulators based upon different computational techniques. HFSS is based on Finite Element Method (FEM) which is more accurate for designing antennas while CST is based upon Finite Integration in Technique (FIT) and is also popular among antenna designers due to ease in simulations. However results of both the simulators are not same because of different computational techniques involved. HFSS results are close to experimental results with more insight into the structure available.

[Vodkaman]

Я смотрел. Мне интересно твое личное мнение, и мнение других профессионалов на этом форуме.

[jomy]

Назрел ряд вопросов:
1. Результаты вычислений в CST и HFSS как правило не совпадают. Профессионалы, как я понял, предпочитают HFSS. Означает ли это, что CST неточная программа для дилетантов, создающая только "красивые картинки"?
2. Кто-нибудь проводил эксперимент по сравнению результатов расчета в обеих программах и данных реальных замеров, реальной антенны?
3. Существует-ли минимальный набор необходимых настроек, который обеспечивает приемлемую точность расчетов?

Посмотреть через Google ..!!!